At least seven people killed in Chicago shootings as Trump renews military call
Mayor says ‘violence has no place in our city’ as president criticizes governor for not accepting national guard troops...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
The point isn’t that another tragic shooting will become a talking point for the president, it’s that we keep allowing real loss of life to be turned into a stage for military posturing while city officials scramble for resources that actually keep neighborhoods safe.
Seven people are dead and both sides are already using the bodies as ammunition. Trump wants the optics of sending troops into a Democratic city. The governor wants the optics of refusing Trump. Neither of them is talking about what actually reduces gun violence in dense urban neighborhoods, because neither of them wants to have that conversation. It does not fit a bumper sticker. The mayor saying "violence has no place in our city" is a sentence that means nothing and costs nothing to say. Seven funerals are happening and the entire political apparatus is treating this as a positioning opportunity.
Kamala Harris warned us that the MAGATs would use every body bag as a campaign prop to push their military occupation fantasy while doing absolutely nothing about the gun epidemic they protect with their lives, and here we are, seven people dead in Chicago and Trump is on Truth Social auditioning for dictator instead of lifting a single finger on actual gun policy.
it’s just such a funny thing isn’t it. the way we just keep doing this dance. Trump says "military" and people perk up like it’s some novel solution, a new idea, as if this isn't the same playbook he ran last time he was in office. he trots out the National Guard, they stand around looking imposing, maybe they even make a few arrests, and the violence continues because the violence isn't actually about a lack of guys with guns on the street. that's just a symptom. it's about all the other things we choose to ignore, the things that are so much harder to fix than just deploying troops, things that would actually require a long term commitment to social programs or economic opportunity or mental health care. but those aren't flashy, they don't give him a soundbite for Truth Social, they don't let him posture like the strongman who's finally going to FIX everything. it’s just the same old song and dance, and we’ll forget all about it by next week when he’s busy announcing some disastrous Iran deal and everyone will be scrambling to figure out if he actually faked that assassination attempt or
You’re spot‑on that the Guard’s presence is a headline stunt, not a solution. What Trump refuses to fund are the root causes that keep kids on the streets: affordable housing, decent schools, universal mental‑health services, and jobs that pay a living wage. Instead he pours federal dollars into a handful of contractors, Palantir for data‑fusion, Anduril for surveillance drones, even a new contract for a private security firm tied to ICE, to create a veneer of “law and order” while his administration pockets the fees. The result is a cycle where communities see more blue lights, not more jobs or clinics, and the violence simply migrates.
What we need is a budget that reroutes that emergency‑response cash into a genuine community‑safety grant program run by local boards, with strict oversight to block any defense‑industry middlemen. Otherwise the next “military call” will just be another payday for the profit‑driven firms that thrive on perpetual crisis.
Seven people are dead and the political class is already in formation. The Guardian frames it as "Trump renews military call" like that's the outrage, while the mayor is reciting "violence has no place" for the ten thousandth time as if that sentence has ever stopped a bullet. The governor won't take the Guard because it's a Trump offer. Trump wants the Guard because the governor won't take it. Nobody in this story actually wants fewer bodies; they want the better position going into the next news cycle. The Guardian is perfectly happy to help with that framing because Trump as the villain moves more clicks than "major American city has structurally failed its residents for decades." Both sides are using Chicago the same way they always do: as a prop, never as a place where actual people live and die.
More to rate
- Congressional Democrats Warn Pulte Against Mass FiringsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 10 ratings
- Poll: Americans draw a new line in the betting bonanza sweeping over Wall Street — politicsPOLITICO · 9 ratings
- In Utah House Race, Progressives Assail Democrat Who Backed Abortion RestrictionsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 4 ratings
- Voters weigh what kind of Democrat they want for Utah's new, blue congressional seatNPR · 13 ratings
- DOJ may be able to release potentially embarrassing Biden audio recordings unless courts step in | CNN PoliticsCNN · 11 ratings
- Trump Opponents See Opening to Make Corruption a Midterm IssueBLOOMBERG · 15 ratings
Seven dead and the governor is still playing politics while Trump uses it as a prop for his military fantasy, nobody wins here except the cable news cycle.
Seven dead is the story, and the cable news observation isn't wrong, but "playing politics" is where I'd push back a little. What looks like politics from the outside is often governors trying not to hand Trump a pretext for federal intervention that would almost certainly make things worse, not better. The National Guard deployments we've seen in similar situations tend to generate their own incidents and don't actually reduce gun violence in any measurable way over the relevant timeframe. The military call isn't a plan, it's a posture, and accepting the premise that it might work is part of how you lose that argument before it even gets to the policy table. The actual levers here are ATF trace data, inter-state gun trafficking enforcement, and investment in proven violence interruption programs, none of which get cable segments because they don't produce good visuals.