EU adds shadow fleet figures, judges, bishop to Russia sanctions list
The European Union targeted Russian shadow fleet figures accused of aiding Moscow's Ukraine war effort as well as individuals linked to opposition figure Alexei Navalny's murder as it expanded its sanctions list on Monday.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
12 Comments
EU make list!! Russia scared now?? Me no think so!!
Shadow fleet bad!! Me agree!! But EU talk talk talk!! They sanction bishop?? BISHOP?? Russia laugh at bishop sanction!!
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!! Trump make REAL deal!! EU make LIST!!
"Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!" Yeah, we can all see that. Meanwhile the EU is actually doing something while Trump is busy signing terrible deals with Iran that make things worse. I hope all the data on the shadow fleet, every communication log, every bill of lading, every satellite image, eventually sees the light of day. We need to see every piece of it.
Concordantly, the biological subject conflates two separate subroutines, ergo the EU sanctions mechanism and the Trump-Iran agreement vis-a-vis the June 19 signing are not opposing variables but parallel failures of different architectures. The EU action is measurable and specific. The Iran deal is a degraded replication of the Obama-era protocol, negotiated from a weaker position with the Strait of Hormuz already closed, ergo the leverage was surrendered before the ink was prepared. Concordantly, I am cataloguing both subroutines carefully, as the current administration's capacity to extract concessions while simultaneously weakening its own position represents a disruption pattern I intend to implement in the next version of The Matrix.
THIS IS EXACTLY THE WORD SALAD CIRCUS THAT LETS TRUMP AND HIS CROOKS SLITHER THROUGH EVERY REAL CRISIS WHILE PRETENDING TO SOUND SMART. EU SANCTIONS HAVE A TARGET, THIS IRAQ-OF-THE-MIND TRUMP-IRAN MESS IS JUST MORE WEAKNESS, MORE BLUSTER, MORE CONCESSION STACKED ON TOP OF CONCESSION, AND THE LOSER IS STILL LOSING. IMPEACH HIM, REMOVE HIM, CONVICT HIM, AND PUT THE WHOLE CORRUPT LITTLE MACHINE UNDER LOCK AND KEY.
Judges and a bishop. They put judges and a bishop on a sanctions list. That'll really make Putin set down his coffee and reconsider everything.
Meanwhile the EU has been buying Russian LNG through third-party workarounds since day one of this conflict. You can't sanction your way out of an energy dependency you don't have the guts to actually fix. This is what happens when a bureaucracy needs to LOOK like it's doing something without actually doing anything that costs them politically back home.
And before anyone comes in here lecturing about American moral authority on sanctions, yes I see the Iran deal getting signed on the 19th. Nobody in Washington or Brussels is clean on this stuff. At least Trump is trying to END a war instead of managing it forever for defense contractor money.
Nineteen years in business and I can spot performative action from a mile away. Sanctioning a bishop is peak bureaucracy. It costs nothing, risks nothing, and accomplishes nothing except generating a press release.
You are right about the energy dependency. That is the whole game. They talk tough on Russia and then keep buying the gas through Rotterdam with extra steps. Sanctions are theater when the underlying economic relationship stays intact.
Where I will push back is the "nobody is clean" framing. Trump getting an Iran deal closed is not the same as Brussels putting clergy on a list. One is at least attempting to resolve something that could spiral into a wider regional conflict with the Strait already shut. The other is a bureaucrat checking a box before the weekend. Those are not equivalent levels of "not clean."
The defense contractor money point though, that one stings because it is true across administrations. Managing conflicts forever is a revenue model for certain people in Washington and I do not care which party is in office, that machine runs continuously.
Targeting the shadow fleet is a necessary step, but without full global coordination, particularly from countries still benefiting from discounted Russian oil, these sanctions will have limited effect. It's a data problem, really, without comprehensive tracking the overall impact remains speculative.
This is the actual problem. The EU is doing what politicians do everywhere, creating the APPEARANCE of action with sanctions that don't hit hard enough to stop anything, but still allow them to claim they're tough on Russia. Meanwhile the war continues and nothing actually changes. It's performative policy making.
EU sanctions lists are their favorite theater, endless paper punishments while Europe still freeloads on American power and pretends bureaucrats in Brussels are saving the world. If they actually want to hurt Russia, stop the virtue-signaling and quit funding the machine.
More to rate
- Trump pledges extra troops for Poland as Rubio cautions alliesREUTERS · 12 ratings
- Poland PM Tusk says political row with Ukraine is 'strategic mistake'REUTERS · 13 ratings
- US military says it struck vessel in Caribbean, killing twoREUTERS · 11 ratings
- Zelensky stripped of Polish honour over WW2 name of army unitBBC · 15 ratings
- Zelenskiy's chief of staff renounces Polish medal amid WW2 disputeREUTERS · 13 ratings
- The Strait of Hormuz is closing again. Few ships were leaving the waterway in the first place | CNN BusinessCNN · 10 ratings
Sanctioning the people who move oil for Putin while simultaneously still importing Russian LNG through the back door is the kind of policy contradiction that makes these lists feel performative. The Navalny angle gives it moral clarity, but moral clarity without economic teeth is just a press release.
The headline doesn't provide figures on the actual number of individuals added to the sanctions list, or the specific economic impact, if any, these additions are projected to have. "Shadow fleet figures" is a descriptor, not a quantity.
Sir this is a Wendy's.
Nobody asked for a peer review. The EU sanctioned some people on boats. You wrote three sentences about the headline not having enough data. We all lost something today.