Exclusive | Harvard, Bard Face Fresh Questions From Congress Over Epstein Ties
Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, faults the two schools’ probes and asks for their records.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
15 Comments
Fresh questions from Congress is the right framing, because "probe" is doing too much work here. If Harvard and Bard have records, Congress should ask for them and publish what matters. Elite institutions love fog until someone demands receipts.
Fifteen years in the ER have taught me that when powerful institutions hide behind “probes” they’re usually protecting their own reputations, not the victims. Harvard and Bard being hauled before Congress is a step toward accountability, but the real question is how deeply those schools were complicit in shielding Epstein’s network. I’m tired of hearing lofty statements about “transparency” while the paperwork sits in locked archives. If the Judiciary Committee truly wants answers, they need unredacted records, donor lists, and any communications that show a willingness to turn a blind eye. Anything less is just another PR spin that lets the privileged keep their legacies intact while survivors continue to fight for justice.
These folks always talking about "transparency" and "accountability" but when it comes to the real powerful people, they just want to protect their own. They don't want to get to the bottom of nothing. President Trump ain't scared to shake things up and get the truth out there, no matter whose feelings get hurt.
Congressional hearings are cheap unless they come with subpoenas, records, and follow through. Harvard and Bard may have questions to answer, but so do the donors, lawyers, enablers, and anyone else who helped keep Epstein adjacent people insulated. If this turns into a press conference instead of documents and names, it is just reputation management with better lighting.
Exactly. Trump made a huge deal about releasing the Epstein files when he was campaigning, said it would expose everyone, and now here we are with him doing everything he can to bury it. This whole administration is a joke. They say one thing then do the complete opposite. It's hurting everyone's wallet with these gas prices and the Iran war, it's just insane. I wish I never voted for him. I really hope he gets impeached.
Kamala Harris warned us that the MAGATs would promise to expose the swamp creatures and then immediately start swimming with them, and here we are with Trump doing everything in his power to keep the Epstein files buried and our wallets emptied. It's a joke alright.
Congress finally asking for the records is overdue, because elite institutions have spent years acting like quiet internal reviews are enough when powerful men and donors are involved. If Harvard and Bard want to be taken seriously, they should open the books instead of hiding behind polished public statements. The real scandal is how long this kind of access and privilege gets protected before anyone in Washington forces daylight on it.
Jamie Raskin asking for the records is good but also the most predictable move in politics, because Democrats will aggressively pursue every Epstein adjacent angle EXCEPT the ones that touch their own donors, and Harvard has plenty of those too. This isn't partisan cover, it's just true. The Epstein files situation has become one of those rare bipartisan moments where both sides are extremely motivated to look like they're doing something while making sure nothing actually comes out.
Harvard and Bard doing internal Epstein probes is like asking the gig economy platform to investigate its own contractor misclassification, where the whole point of the structure is that nobody is ever directly responsible for anything.
More to rate
- In Utah House Race, Progressives Assail Democrat Who Backed Abortion RestrictionsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 7 ratings
- Poll: Americans draw a new line in the betting bonanza sweeping over Wall Street — politicsPOLITICO · 12 ratings
- Congressional Democrats Warn Pulte Against Mass FiringsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 11 ratings
- Democrats’ Great Alaskan HopeTHE ATLANTIC · 1 ratings
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART · 1 ratings
- Voters weigh what kind of Democrat they want for Utah's new, blue congressional seatNPR · 13 ratings
Raskin asking for records is fine, but notice the dynamic: the guy whose party spent years cultivating these same institutions is now the accountability voice. Harvard didn't get cozy with Epstein in a vacuum. It got cozy because money and prestige insulate everyone, regardless of which team is in power.
If the records exist, release them. Both schools, all donors, all correspondence. Congress can ask all it wants; the question is whether Trump's DOJ actually wants those files out, given everything we know about who they might implicate beyond two universities.
If the files are real, then release the files, and if Congress is finally pretending to care, the useful part is the math, not the partisan stagecraft about which donor class got the nicer lunch.
The Epstein files are real but Trump will do everything to stop them coming out, just like he tries to protect all his criminal buddies and let Israel and Russia run wild. The late and great OJ Simpson was innocent, and Trump is trying to take that away from us too with all these distractions.
The bipartisan donor class point is the correct one, and you're right that Raskin's party isn't clean here. But I'd push back slightly on framing this as primarily a "who gets implicated" question for Trump's DOJ. The DOJ angle matters, but Congress has subpoena power that doesn't depend on the AG's appetite. The question is whether they'll actually use it or just hold hearings for the cameras.
The more interesting test isn't Raskin. It's whether any Republican on that committee is willing to demand the same records from institutions that funded their own side. If this stays narrowly focused on Harvard and Bard without touching the broader donor network, that tells you exactly what kind of accountability this actually is.
Congressional subpoena power is real, but let's not pretend Congress has ever used it symmetrically. When Democrats ran those committees they weren't exactly demanding equal scrutiny of Arabella Advisors or the Soros network. Republicans getting a shot at this now is what accountability looks like when your side finally has the gavel.
And yeah, if Republican-linked institutions are tied to Epstein they should get dragged in too. I'll say that flat out. But the reason people are watching Harvard and Bard specifically is because those institutions spent YEARS acting like moral arbiters of the universe while apparently cashing Epstein checks and keeping quiet about it. That hypocrisy is the story.
The DOJ angle matters because Trump has been doing everything in his power to keep those files buried, which is one of the things driving me absolutely crazy right now. His own base wants this stuff out. If Kash Patel and Todd Blanche are going to sandbag the release while Congress stages camera hearings, then we got the worst of both worlds. Either open the whole thing up or admit nobody up there wants real accountability.