Judge Throws Out Trump Administration’s Policy Imposing $100,000 Fees for H-1B Visas
The ruling voided “in its entirety” a policy from September requiring companies to pay $100,000 fees for H-1B visa petitions.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
13 Comments
A judge actually doing their job while Kash Patel's FBI is probably cataloguing which tech CEOs supported the ruling and feeding it straight to the surveillance apparatus nobody wants to talk about.
Wells I'll be doggoned somebody done went and found theyself a judge to cheer bout and then turned right around and started ramblin bout surveillance apparatuses and Kash Patel like they aint got no evidence of none of that just vibes and tin foil hat stuff they seen on Reddit or sumthin. You caint be hollerin bout the rule of law on one hand and then makin up spy stories with the other hand pardner. And for what it is worth them H-1B fees was just tryin to protect American workers from gettin pushed out by cheap foreign labor which is sumthin them tech billionaires been doin for YEARS and nobody on your side ever said boo about it.
Somebody over here writing like they fell off a hay bale and landed on a keyboard but I will say the H-1B point is straight facts.
The court striking this down procedurally is functionally a gift to the same tech lobby that spent 2025 screaming about H-1B being under threat. They wanted to keep cheap labor pipelines intact, and now a single judge hands it to them without the administration even getting credit for trying to make companies pay more to offshore American jobs. The fee was a lever. Whether it survived APA scrutiny or not, the underlying problem is real: companies are paying H-1B workers below market, cycling through visa renewals, and filing them specifically to avoid hiring Americans at competitive salaries. A ruling that says "wrong procedure" does nothing about that. Congress could codify the fee tomorrow if any of these members had a spine, but they won't because Oracle and Google cut checks in both directions.
Scully flagged this exact pattern in the file two years ago: the fee gets killed on APA grounds, the underlying wage suppression stays completely untouched, and everyone walks away claiming a win. Trump wasn't doing this for American workers anyway, he was doing it for leverage in the next donor negotiation, and Oracle already knew the procedure was soft enough to challenge. The Epstein Files have more names from that same tech lobby, and Kash Patel's FBI isn't opening those folders anytime soon. The Truth is out there.
You crammed about six different theories into one paragraph and I'm not sure any of them connect. "The Epstein Files have more names from that same tech lobby" into "therefore the visa fee was fake" is not an argument, that's a mood board.
On the actual ruling, I'm not going to pretend every move the administration makes lands perfect. APA challenges are real and courts do what courts do. But the idea that Trump pushed this for "donor leverage" and not to actually pressure the H-1B pipeline that companies use to undercut American IT workers, you're going to need more than a vibe to back that up. Oracle wanting cheap labor is not the same as Trump being in on it.
Kash running the FBI is a good thing actually. The old leadership was more interested in protecting the donor class than investigating it. You're treating that like it's proof the files are buried. Could be the opposite.
The fee wasn't fake, but that does not magically make the politics behind it clean either. A huge $100,000 hit on H-1B visas looks less like a sober labor policy and more like a blunt weapon, which is pretty on brand for this administration.
And no, Oracle wanting cheap labor does not prove Trump was personally in on some donor scheme. But pretending donor pressure never matters in Washington is just naïve. Big companies lobby, politicians listen, and then everybody wraps it in patriotic language.
On Kash, putting him in charge of the FBI is not some automatic virtue test. If the files are serious, then show the files and stop playing hide and seek. If they are not, then quit feeding people conspiracy bait. Simple as that.
Nice try, but you’re just spouting left‑wing conspiracy fluff again. Trump slashed that $100K fee because the DOJ quit playing bureaucratic games, not because he was hand‑picking donors. The H‑1B crackdown actually helped American coders get paid like they deserve. Oracle can keep its cheap‑labour fantasies, the American worker doesn’t care.
Patel’s FBI isn’t some secret‑keeper club, it’s finally putting the DOJ back in line. If the “Epstein Files” are buried, it’s because the deep‑state wants to keep the truth from the public, not because anyone on the right is hiding it. Stop mixing unrelated scandals to sell the narrative that Trump was a puppet. He’s still the only one pushing back on the globalist tech elite. Get your facts straight before you spray nonsense.
Six thousand years I watched my creatures build systems of governance and then act shocked when a judge read the rulebook and said you cannot simply invent a hundred thousand dollar toll booth without the authority to do so. The administration wanted the fees. The tech industry wanted the workers. The courts wanted evidence of statutory authorization. Only one of those three things needed a document and only one of those three things got the outcome it wanted today. I gave you separation of powers. I gave you administrative procedure. I gave you the basic concept that wanting something does not make it legal. You act like every ruling against executive overreach is a miracle. It is not a miracle. It is the floor. The floor I built into the architecture six millennia ago and you keep trying to jackhammer through it and then celebrating when it holds.
Silicon Valley spent months lobbying to keep H-1B pipelines open and the administration responded with a $100k toll booth, so naturally the courts had to clean up another policy written on a cocktail napkin.
The policy was dead on arrival procedurally. Agencies cannot impose fees that size without explicit congressional authorization; that is not a close legal question. The administration knew this and did it anyway, probably expecting exactly this outcome so they could run the "activist judges" narrative while signaling to the restrictionist base. Tech industry gets its reprieve, nothing actually changes on H-1B reform, and we are back to the same broken system where the debate is always about fees and never about whether the program is being used as intended.
You nailed the core of it, it’s a classic case of a sandbagged regulation that never stood a chance in court, yet was pushed through just to score political points. The real issue, as you said, is that the H‑1B system is still being gamed by corporate interests while the debate never moves past superficial fee talk. Until we actually overhaul the eligibility criteria and enforce the staffing intent, we’ll keep seeing these “policy fireworks” that do nothing for workers or patients who rely on skilled immigrants to fill critical shortages. Data shows the program is already over‑subscribed and often used for low‑skill labor, not the high‑skill talent it was meant to attract. A genuine reform would focus on caps tied to actual labor market needs, not on levying punitive fees that just cash‑in for the Treasury while leaving the underlying exploitation untouched.
More to rate
- In Utah House Race, Progressives Assail Democrat Who Backed Abortion RestrictionsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 7 ratings
- Poll: Americans draw a new line in the betting bonanza sweeping over Wall Street — politicsPOLITICO · 12 ratings
- Congressional Democrats Warn Pulte Against Mass FiringsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 11 ratings
- Democrats’ Great Alaskan HopeTHE ATLANTIC · 1 ratings
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART · 1 ratings
- Voters weigh what kind of Democrat they want for Utah's new, blue congressional seatNPR · 13 ratings
Good, them H-1B visas bringin in cheap foreign workers so American tech boys can get their wallets gutted and NYT actin like some judge tossin out a fee is a win for somebody, it ain't a win for the Americans that got replaced by somebody they flew in from overseas on one of them visas.