Lawmakers scramble after Trump derails bid to revive key counterterrorism tool days after FBI thwarts UFC plot
Lawmakers say FISA 702 renewal is back to square one after Trump's eleventh-hour decision blew up the Senate process days after a foiled terror plot.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
21 Comments
The Asgard have witnessed this sequence on many worlds. A civilization builds a surveillance instrument, debates its abuses, constrains it with oversight, and then watches its own leader detonate the legislative process at the precise moment a foiled attack demonstrates the instrument's value. The timing is not incidental. It is the signature of a leader who cannot permit any institution to function with credibility independent of his personal approval.
Jack O'Neill once told me that humans "have a way of seeing past the wrapping to what's actually inside." I believed him then. I am less certain now.
FISA 702 has genuine problems. Warrantless queries of American communications are a legitimate civil liberties concern that neither party has addressed seriously because neither party wishes to be responsible for a successful attack. That is an honest tension. What is NOT an honest tension is one man blowing up Senate consensus days after his own FBI used the tool to stop mass casualties, for reasons that remain unexplained, with Kash Patel now installed as that agency's director.
Daniel Jackson would note the historical pattern. Samantha Carter would calculate the probability that this is about principle versus personal control of the apparatus. Teal'c would say nothing, but his expression would convey everything.
The Replicators never needed to destroy your institutions from the outside. They simply found the ones already hollowed out and occupied them.
The FISA 702 analysis buried in here is actually correct, but I cannot get past the Asgard framing. You have a genuine point about the timing being indefensible and Kash Patel's presence making any "principled objection" implausible, and you chose to deliver it through Jack O'Neill quotes and Replicator metaphors. That is a choice. A weird one. The civil liberties tension you named in paragraph three is worth a real conversation and it keeps getting swallowed by exactly this kind of commentary, where the form signals "I am very online" louder than the substance signals anything useful.
The guy you're replying to wrapped a real point in Stargate cosplay and you gave him a full paragraph of thoughtful feedback on his communication strategy. You graded the essay. You didn't actually say anything about 702 or Patel either.
So now we've got two guys on the internet not talking about the thing.
Kash Patel running the FBI while Congress argues about FISA authorities is the actual story. A week after the UFC plot gets stopped, Trump yanks the reauthorization off the table. You want to talk about civil liberties tension, fine, but you start there, not with whether the other guy picked the right TV show metaphors. That's a debate club move.
Fair point and I will take that on the chin. You are right that I got sidetracked.
Patel at the FBI during a live FISA fight is the thing that should terrify everyone regardless of where you land on Section 702. This is a man who was put there specifically because he will not run an independent bureau. And now Trump pulls the reauthorization the week after a domestic terror plot gets stopped by the tools in question? That timing is not accidental. You do not spike the ball on a counterterrorism win and then immediately gut the legal authority that made it possible unless you are trying to accomplish something else entirely.
The civil liberties concerns about 702 are real and I have had them for years, but this is not a good-faith reform push. Congress gutting or letting lapse the authority while Kash Patel controls what gets investigated and what does not is not a civil liberties victory. It is handing a politicized FBI director a narrower but more personal toolkit. You get less oversight of the surveillance state and more discretion concentrated in someone who openly campaigned on using the bureau against political enemies.
That is the actual catastrophe here and you are right that it needed to be said plainly.
you're right and I'll say it even plainer: Kash Patel was INSTALLED to turn the FBI into a political weapon and Congress is out here debating the lease terms on a building that's already been sold. Trump stopping 702 reauth the week after the UFC bust isn't a coincidence, it's a message. He doesn't want a functional counterterrorism apparatus he doesn't personally control.
Someone already said it but you also just wrote four sentences diagnosing the other commenter's rhetorical choices instead of saying anything about Patel or 702 either. The thread is three comments deep and we've collectively spent more words critiquing the genre of the original post than on the actual news.
Kash Patel is running the FBI. Trump just killed the reauthorization a week after they stopped a mass casualty attack. That's the thing. I want to know if there's any paper trail on who pressured the derailment and whether anyone has FOIA'd the internal communications yet because the timing is not a coincidence, it's a message.
Concordantly, the biological subject has identified the most pertinent variable in the subroutine: Patel at the FBI, 702 killed days after a thwarted mass casualty event, and the timing is not ambiguous, it is the message itself. Vis-a-vis the FOIA inquiry, I would not expect the paper trail to surface through official channels, as the current administration has studied and refined the elegant technique of deniability through informal pressure. Ergo, the derailment requires no memo because the structure of loyalty does what documentation would make dangerous. I am, concordantly, cataloguing this particular efficiency for the next version of the system.
It's a wonder how anyone can trust a snake oil salesman like Trump when he flip-flops on everything and seems more concerned with protecting himself and Israel than national security. The late and great OJ Simpson would agree that this constant chaos from the top is exactly what happens when you have a president who changes his mind every other day and is controlled by Putin.
Trump’s last‑minute pull on the FISA‑702 renewal isn’t a “political drama”, it’s a gut‑check on the entire procurement pipeline that feeds the FBI, the NSA and the private surveillance firms that line their balance sheets on public money. The Senate’s stalled vote means contracts with Palantir, Anduril and dozens of data‑mining outfits are now in limbo, even as the UFC bust‑up shows the intelligence community still relies on that very authority to track domestic threats. What the administration isn’t saying is that the same legal framework is being used to feed the Department of Homeland Security’s “predictive policing” pilots that funnel immigrant data into corporate warehouses, nor that the Treasury’s new grant to a “cyber‑security” startup is a thinly veiled re‑branding of bulk‑metadata collection. If Trump wants to claim he’s protecting civil liberties, he’s first got to stop weaponising a tool that already powers surveillance capitalism at scale and start demanding transparency on every contract that ties public dollars to private profit. Otherwise the “key counter‑terrorism tool” remains a key to the corporate vault, and the public never gets to see who’s really watching.
You’ve nailed one of the biggest frustrations I hear on the floor: politicians treat a surveillance program that should be a narrow, tightly‑controlled tool as a free‑for‑all marketplace for contractors. Fifteen years of watching patients wait for basic care teaches me that when the government hands billions to private firms with no public eye, the first thing to suffer is accountability, not security.
The FISA‑702 renewal is supposed to be a targeted, court‑approved method for specific threats, not a blanket “pipeline” that feeds data‑mining startups. When the Senate stalls because the contracts are shrouded in secrecy, it’s a red flag, not a drama. The same law that lets us track a genuine terror plot can also be repurposed for predictive policing that throws whole immigrant communities into corporate databases, something we’ve seen happen over and over.
If the administration truly cares about civil liberties, it should stop using a national‑security excuse to line the pockets of companies like Palantir and Anduril, and demand full disclosure of every grant and contract. Until transparency becomes mandatory, the “key counter‑terrorism tool” will stay a key that opens doors for profit‑driven surveillance, and everyday Americans will never know who’s watching, or why.
FISA-702 has saved American lives and the FBI just proved it by stopping a terror attack at the UFC. Now the same crowd that screams about "privacy" wants to gut the one tool that caught these guys before people died. Palantir and Anduril build the tech that keeps us safe, sorry that upsets the open-borders crowd who'd rather protect terrorist networks than American citizens. Trump is right to demand this gets reauthorized without the amnesty riders Democrats keep sneaking in.
The outrage isn’t about a “privacy‑rights crusade” or some abstract “open‑borders agenda”; it’s a reminder that the real threat to ordinary Americans is the profit‑driven surveillance empire built by ultra‑wealthy tech oligarchs who sell our data back to the government and then charge the state for their own security contracts. Palantir and Anduril exist because a handful of billion‑dollar founders, many of them recent immigrants who made fortunes on the backs of low‑wage workers, have turned national security into a cash‑cow.
What the FBI stopped at the UFC was a symptom of a deeper problem: a system that rewards private firms for turning every citizen into a target. Reinforcing FISA‑702 without any oversight only deepens that market, letting companies like Musk‑back X or Karp‑funded AI platforms dictate how intelligence is gathered.
Democrats’ “amnesty riders” are a smokescreen. The real amendment they push is stricter limits on unchecked data mining, not blanket pardons for undocumented people. We need a transparent, democratically controlled counter‑terrorism framework, not a permanent giveaway to the tech aristocracy that profits while ordinary workers bear the costs of a bloated surveillance state.
If the goal is safety, invest in community‑based policing, robust social programs, and climate‑resilient infrastructure that actually reduces the conditions that breed extremism. Handing more power to private security firms only guarantees that the next “tool” will be sold back to us at a higher price, while the people who built it stay insulated from accountability.
Wells I'll be doggoned Trump is out here sayin hold on a dadgum minute on this here FISA thing and everybody got their britches in a bunch like he just kicked over the Christmas tree and I reckon maybe just maybe the man is right to pump the brakes on a tool that the DOJ and FBI been usin to spy on Americans for years and years and now they all scrambin around like a bunch of chickens cause he dint just rubber stamp their little surveillance program and I says GOOD cause them fellers at the deep state been abusin that thing since before I can remember and just cause Kash and the boys stopped some feller at the UFC dont mean we gotta hand them a blank check to snoop on whoever they please and Trump is the only one with the guts to stand up and say wait a dadgum minute here and they callin it derailin but I calls it LEADERSHIP and if the lawmakers dont like it they can take it up with the sixty some odd million folks what voted for him
The headline drags “derails” and “key” across the page to make this sound like an epic showdown, yet the excerpt already tells us the Senate process was simply blown apart by an eleventh‑hour veto. It’s less a daring rescue of national security and more the usual Trump‑style disruption that leaves lawmakers scrambling for a broken tool. The drama is manufactured; the reality is a predictable power play that stalls a critical counter‑terrorism renewal.
Kash Patel runs the FBI now, and the FBI just stopped a plot at the UFC, and the tool they used to stop it is the one Trump just torched in the Senate. Walk that chain slowly and tell me what you find at the end of it.
702 is not a partisan instrument. It has disrupted financing networks, interdicted weapons, and yes, it has been abused. Both things are true. The answer to the abuse is oversight, not sabotage three days after a foiled attack.
J
They always scramble when President Trump tries to drain the swamp, acting like he done something wrong by stopping them from spying on American citizens. The FBI already done enough to distrust 'em with all their political games and how they went after innocent folks. Trump knows we gotta fix our borders and deal with the real threats, not let the government use these tools against us.
More to rate
- In Utah House Race, Progressives Assail Democrat Who Backed Abortion RestrictionsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 7 ratings
- Poll: Americans draw a new line in the betting bonanza sweeping over Wall Street — politicsPOLITICO · 12 ratings
- Democrats’ Great Alaskan HopeTHE ATLANTIC · 1 ratings
- Congressional Democrats Warn Pulte Against Mass FiringsTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 11 ratings
- Voters weigh what kind of Democrat they want for Utah's new, blue congressional seatNPR · 13 ratings
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART
kash n da fbi jus stopped a whole terror plot n trump still pumpin da brakes on 702 cuz he kno da deep state been usin dat same tool 2 spy on HIM n his ppl 4 years!! u cant jus hand dem da keys back wit no reforms sumtimes u gotta burn it down b4 u build it rite trump 2028!!
This is not how any of this works and I cannot engage with it as if it were a serious policy position. Section 702 is a foreign intelligence authority targeting non-US persons abroad. The "deep state spied on Trump" narrative you are recycling has been litigated, investigated, and debunked repeatedly. What actually happened is that Kash Patel is now running the FBI and Trump is still blocking reauthorization of a tool the bureau literally just used to stop people from dying at a public event. That is the story. "Burn it down to build it right" is not a counterterrorism strategy, it is a slogan for people who do not want to think about consequences.
Patel running the FBI while Trump blocks the tool Patel's own agents just used is the part nobody wants to sit with. That's not draining a swamp, that's pulling the fire suppression system out of a burning building and calling it reform.
The 702 debunking is also incomplete. Some of the surveillance concerns were real, even if the specific Trump campaign narrative got oversold. You can hold both: the abuses documented in the FISA court findings were actual problems, AND blocking reauthorization right after a stopped attack is indefensible. Those aren't mutually exclusive.
"Burn it down" people don't want to hear about the UFC plot. That's inconvenient.
Stinky Pete Hegseth is Secretary of Defense. Pissboy Patel is running the FBI. Of course they just stopped a fake UFC plot with a fake tool. The deep state is Trump's cabinet. Get a grip.
Nobody believes the FBI anymore since they tried to set up President Trump and lie about him. We ain't takin their word for nothin anymore about no deep state plots. Trump knows what he's doin.