Trump's UFC birthday bash is a gift to his billionaire friends
The White House was privatized for the financial benefit of Trump's wealthy allies.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
If the White House is being used to entertain billionaire friends, that is not public service, it is the sort of crony behavior that gives the whole town a bad name. Trump always knew how to turn everything into a deal for the people already on top, and the rest of us get the bill.
A sitting president used the White House as a venue for a pay-to-play donor event and the framing we get is "birthday bash." A birthday bash. The president of the United States invited UFC and its billionaire backers into the people's house as a reward for their financial support, and we are treating this as a lifestyle piece.
This is what privatization of public office looks like in practice. Not in the abstract, not as a theoretical concern. Here, concretely: the White House is being used to generate returns for people who invested in Trump. That is the function it serves now.
Every president has hosted events at the White House. None of them treated it as a membership perk for their donor class. The distinction is not subtle. It requires active effort to miss it.
Exactly, the White House has become a velvet‑rope lounge for the oligarchs who bankroll a circus, and the press pretends it’s just “another party.” It’s not a fresh tradition of presidential hospitality; it’s a blatant cash‑for‑access showcase that makes the idea of a public servant look like a punchline. When a sitting president turns the official residence into a private club for UFC’s billionaire backers, you don’t get a harmless birthday celebration, you get a reminder that democracy is being auctioned off to the highest bidder. The outrage should be about the outright commodification of a symbol that belongs to every American, not about whether a cake was stacked with extra frosting.
Obama had Jay-Z at the White House. Clinton had Hollywood royalty in there every other weekend. Nobody at Salon wrote one word about the "privatization" of the people's house when the donor class was Democrat-flavored.
Trump throws a UFC event and suddenly the building's been sold off. Nine years of this exact story, different occasion. At some point you'd think they'd get tired of their own act.
Nine years and counting because the stuff keeps happening, so.
But I want to address the Jay-Z comparison directly because this is the argument conservatives have been running since 2017 and it does not land the way you think it does. Jay-Z at the White House was a cultural event. A UFC birthday bash where the guest list reads like a Forbes 400 reunion is a fundraising mechanism with a theme. The difference is not vibes, it is the donor-to-policy pipeline that comes after the photos.
My parents' generation watched politicians throw parties too. The question was always who got the call back the next morning. When it's the same billionaires showing up at every event, at Mar-a-Lago, in the Cabinet, in the deregulation memos, the party is not the point. The party is the receipt.
"Both parties do it" is technically true and also completely useless as an analysis. Yes rich people buy access everywhere. That does not mean the scale, the shamelessness, and the direct Cabinet-level payoffs are equivalent. One of these things is not like the other right now and you know it.
Another simulation glitch, the White House getting treated like a billionaire clubhouse is what happens when corruption wears a red hat and calls itself patriotism. Fox News will probably dress it up as fair and balanced while both parties keep feeding the same rotten machine.
Salon has been running some version of this headline since 2017. Not saying they're wrong on the facts here, but the outrage machine runs on clicks, and "gift to billionaires" is evergreen content for them. The White House being used for donor access is a real problem worth scrutinizing. It was a real problem under Obama's bundler dinners and Clinton's Lincoln Bedroom fundraisers too. Call it out every time, every president, or admit you're just doing partisan activation content.
It's hard to dispute this when the President constantly puts himself in situations that look like conflicts of interest. The optics are terrible, and frankly, the pattern of blurring lines between personal business and public office is just a continuation of past practices. Both sides like to complain about the other doing it, but this administration takes it to another level.