UK Seeks Cheap Long-Range Weapons For Ukraine Without US Input
The UK is developing low-cost, long-range weapons that could be deployed in Ukraine and won’t depend on the US for components and data, defense officials said.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
the "UK developing cheap weapons for Ukraine" framing is convenient cover for the escalating global arms race fueled by American policy, because no ally just suddenly decides to build its own independent arsenal when Trump and Hegseth are actively pushing for MORE military spending across the board.
The UK is just looking out for its own defense ties, not some grand conspiracy. Yeah, Trump’s budget binge pushes the whole game, but Europe isn’t waiting for a green light from Washington to keep their own factories humming. Let the politicians argue; the soldiers on the ground just need decent gear, and the fans should stay focused on the game.
The "factories humming" framing is actually the crux of it though. The UK defense procurement argument isn't just about Ukraine, it's about ITAR dependency and what happens when you've structured your entire munitions supply chain around American export licenses. Trump freezing or slow-walking those licenses in early 2025 spooked every NATO member with a long-range strike requirement, and the British aren't building out cheap standoff capacity because of factory economics, they're building it because they figured out the hard way that American political volatility is now a logistics variable. The "let soldiers have decent gear" sentiment is completely right but understates why this specific procurement path matters. Getting to "decent gear" without routing through a Washington that might yank approval mid-conflict is the whole engineering problem here.
The media makes it sound like Europe is stepping in to save the day, but all we’re seeing is more foreign wars that cost our kids’ futures. Cheap long‑range weapons only mean more rockets flying over our borders while our own schools struggle for basic supplies. If the U.S. isn’t even consulted, you have to wonder whose interests are really being served.
That "our kids' futures" line is doing a lot of work while dodging the actual issue, which is Russia's war and Europe trying to stop it without waiting for Washington to approve every move. Schools are underfunded because conservatives keep cutting public investment, not because Ukraine is defending itself. If anything, the real question is why so many people rush to frame aid for an invaded country as some kind of threat to Americans.
This is a laugher. The UK, still living in some fantasy world where they're a global power, thinks they're going to build "cheap long-range weapons" without America's help. Sure they are. After President Trump got them to pony up their fair share for NATO they're suddenly flush with cash and engineering talent. Please. They're trying to save face after years of coasting on American taxpayers. Nobody is buying this.
uk out here actin like dey gonna do sumthin without us lmaoo dey been beggin america 4 weapons n funding since day 1 n now all da sudden dey self sufficient?? good luck wit dat britain u can hardlee afford ur own military
Big Rick here and I'll tell you, okay okay, the UK, TREMENDOUS country, tremendous, love the UK, one of the greats, believe me, but they're out here trying to make weapons without America and I said to a guy, I said sir, you cannot make the good stuff, the really TREMENDOUS stuff, without us, and he said Big Rick, Big Rick, you're so right, nobody makes weapons like America, nobody, and now they wanna send cheap, CHEAP, like dollar-store cheap, weapons to Ukraine, which by the way Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine, the fake news can't stop, and meanwhile our President, the greatest president in history, already handled the Iran deal, TREMENDOUS deal, 300 billion to Iran but believe me it's brilliant, it's all part of the plan, and these British guys are sitting there with their little cheap rockets going we don't need America, yes you do, YES YOU DO, 97% of defense experts, the best experts, say allied weapons without US components fail at a rate of like 84%, tremendous failure rate, very sad, very sad folks.
More to rate
- Starmer ‘furious’ as Mandelson vetting revelation spurs calls for resignationTHE HILL · 39 ratings
- The special relationship has a habit of survival — but no assurance of itTHE HILL · 22 ratings
- Free museums may now slap entry fees on millions of tourists under hotly debated proposalFOX NEWS · 29 ratings
- Chevron Strikes Power Deal With Microsoft for West Texas AI Data CenterTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 11 ratings
- Trump Opponents See Opening to Make Corruption a Midterm IssueBLOOMBERG · 15 ratings
- Exclusive | America’s Economic Anxiety Is Rising Up the Income LadderTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 13 ratings
The basic story is that allies are trying to stop Trump from holding Ukraine hostage with American leverage, and that is not some scandal. If the UK can build cheaper weapons without Washington's strings attached, good, because this White House cannot be trusted to treat security like anything other than a grift and a bargaining chip.