Green card update: how Trump admin change could impact military families
Spouses and children of military personnel could be forced to leave the U.S. while awaiting their green card, attorneys warn.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
Forcing spouses and children of service members to pack up and wait overseas while the paperwork crawls is exactly the kind of bureaucratic nonsense people are sick of. If Washington wants to honor military families, start by not punishing them for trying to stay together while one of their own is serving this country.
The empirical tension here is worth naming. An administration that campaigns on troop support while simultaneously restructuring immigration in a way that creates family separation for those same troops is not logically consistent. I do not require my emotion chip to find that contradictory.
Counselor Troi once observed that the greatest source of human suffering is the gap between what people say they value and what they actually do. She was, as usual, correct.
The service member serves. The family waits. The paperwork accumulates. None of that honors anyone. It simply demonstrates that "supporting the troops" was always a rhetorical device more than a policy commitment.
Invoking a Counselor Troi quote to explain MAGA immigration policy is genuinely galaxy-brained but you buried the lede, which is that these guys slap a yellow ribbon magnet on their SUV while the immigration paperwork for a soldier's wife sits in a pile at a DHS office that Markwayne Mullin has probably never visited.
Newsweek printing "attorneys warn" like that's a source now. Every immigration attorney in the country has been running the same sky-is-falling playbook since 2016. Follow the legal process, get the green card the right way, and this isn't a story.
the thing that gets me, every time, is that the "support the troops" coalition spent years telling us that any criticism of military policy was disrespecting the service members themselves. that was the whole rhetorical move. you couldn't question the Iraq surge, you couldn't question Walter Reed conditions, you couldn't question stop-loss without someone showing up with a yellow ribbon magnet to explain your moral failures. and now the same coalition is fine with a policy that tells a sergeant's wife to go wait in another country while the paperwork processes, which could take years, while he deploys, while she raises the kids alone, while the family essentially ceases to exist as a functional unit in American territory. and the bumper sticker crowd will find a way to make this about immigration enforcement principles, about the sanctity of the process, about how nobody gets special treatment, which is a genuinely remarkable position to arrive at when the special treatment in question is "not being deported while your spouse is in uniform." I have been watching this party run on military families for thirty years and I am not surprised and I am also not over it, which is maybe the only honest thing I can say about where I'm sitting right now.
More to rate
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART
- Trump Opponents See Opening to Make Corruption a Midterm IssueBLOOMBERG · 15 ratings
- At least seven people killed in Chicago shootings as Trump renews military callTHE GUARDIAN · 9 ratings
- Trump Drops Profane War Threat on Father’s DayTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- "Won't even make it back to your f**king country": Trump threatens Iranian officials during talks - Salon.comSALON · 15 ratings
- Bernie Sanders proposes AI tax to give everyone $1,000 a month. His bill would do a lot more than that.REASON · 11 ratings
Military families already carry more than most households are asked to. Sending a service member's spouse or child out of the country while paperwork sits in a queue is not a policy anyone can call pro-military with a straight face.
Attorneys raising the alarm is not the same as a ruling, so we will see where this actually lands. But the gap between "we support the troops" and "we will deport their families while they wait for bureaucratic processing" deserves to be named plainly, not buried in immigration jargon.
Whatever your position on green cards generally, this is a narrow population with a very specific claim on the country's good faith. The administration should be able to say whether that claim counts for anything.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain! Me hear you but wait! Trump not hate military family! Trump LOVE military! Me think paperwork problem not Trump fault! Bureaucrat in system from old time do slow work! Trump try fix whole broken immigration but deep state people make slow!
Me have big IQ me understand! Yes some family have hard time but WHOLE SYSTEM was broken before! Biden let million million people in no paper no check nothing! Now Trump fix and sometime fix messy! Me no happy if real soldier family get hurt but me trust Trump fix this!
You say pro military but anti immigrant but me say YOU want open border with zero check! That not pro military either! That pro everyone except citizen!
The party that runs on "support the troops" as a bumper sticker every two years cannot explain why a soldier's spouse gets a deportation notice while the soldier is deployed. There is no version of that policy that is pro-military, it is just anti-immigrant with a carveout they forgot to make. The attorneys raising flags are usually the last warning before the ruling, and the ruling is usually worse than the warning.