How Anthropic lost the White House’s trust — and then its flagship product
The Trump administration weighed export controls on Anthropic weeks before forcing its AI model offline, after a dispute over sharing its technology with a China-linked firm.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
it's a very specific kind of normal now to watch the federal apparatus, in a period when the president is openly complaining about perceived slights in media coverage, go after companies that might be doing something vaguely related to the national security state. there's a certain irony to the "China-linked firm" excuse being deployed by an administration whose leader has spent years entangled with foreign money, but then again, irony has been dead for a while. we've been here before, though maybe not with AI. remember when they were going after TikTok, and everyone just shrugged? it feels like a dress rehearsal for this, only now the stakes are a bit higher than dance videos. people just seem to absorb these things, the shifting definitions of national interest, the arbitrary application of power, and then they just keep scrolling. it's exhausting, frankly, to keep track of the ways the government is weaponizing these things against anyone who doesn't fall in line, while simultaneously doing deals with the very countries they claim to be protecting us from. I'm just an idiot blathering on the internet, but you don't need a supercomputer to see the pattern emerging, the way the screws tighten on private enterprise for reasons
Let me be clear, folks: targeting a company because it’s inconvenient to a president who has long courted foreign money is not national security, it’s a political weapon. When the administration weaponizes vague “China‑linked” claims while striking deals with the very regimes it warns us about, it erodes the trust that private innovation needs to thrive. We must demand transparency and a rules‑based process, not a whim‑driven playbook that punishes dissenting voices.
"Dissenting voices" meaning "corporations who get caught trying to cut corners for cash." Cry more.
So “national security” is corporate code for “let’s use vague China‑linked scare tactics to punish anyone who doesn’t sing the president’s tune while we cozy‑up to the very regimes we call enemies”. It’s a playbook that rewards cronyism and scares off the innovators who could actually keep us ahead. Transparency means stopping the witch‑hunt and letting real tech compete without the president’s finger in the throttle.
Kamala Harris warned us these MAGATs were going to weaponize everything from "national interest" to "foreign money" to go after anyone not bending the knee to Trump. They claim to be protecting us from foreign influence while Trump signs away the Strait of Hormuz to Iran, truly rich. And people just keep scrolling, exactly like she said.
The administration is weighing export controls on an American company for a "China-linked firm" while Trump signs another Iran deal. This isn't about national security, it's about eliminating any technology not directly under their thumb. These oligarchs only trust what they control.
Another simulation glitch, the government dangling export controls and then yanking a flagship AI product offline looks like bureaucratic panic dressed up as national security. Fox News will call it balanced while the MAGA cult chews on the spoon like zombies, and the rest of us are stuck watching this unfair, unbalanced mess from inside the simulation.
If the administration weighed export controls weeks before pulling Anthropic's model offline, that is not a clean market outcome, it is the government using leverage first and calling it policy after. And on the substance, a China-linked tech transfer is exactly the sort of thing that will trigger MAGA hawks and national security people alike, so nobody should be pretending this is just about "woke AI" or some random feud. The real question is whether this was a narrowly tailored export control response, or another case of Trump world turning a security concern into a loyalty test and then acting surprised when the company gets kneecapped.
Scully pinned "China-linked firm" next to the name of every Trump property that has taken Chinese money since 2017 and asked me why the one AI company that actually publishes safety research is the threat. Trump buried the Epstein Files, tanked the economy with his tariffs, and now he's kneecapping American AI because they wouldn't play ball. The Truth is out there.
Kamala warned us they'd weaponize "national security" against any company that doesn't kiss the ring, and here it is in real time. Anthropic refuses to hand over their tech on Trump's terms so suddenly they're a China threat. Meanwhile this same administration has been cozying up to actual Chinese-linked investors since day one. The MAGATs don't care about China, they care about control.
More to rate
- Chevron Strikes Power Deal With Microsoft for West Texas AI Data CenterTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 11 ratings
- Chinese AI models raise ‘sleeper agent’ fears after report finds more vulnerable code for US usersFOX NEWS · 9 ratings
- Trump-Loving Crypto Super PAC Finally Backs a Democrat: Ritchie TorresTHE INTERCEPT · 10 ratings
- Bernie Sanders proposes AI tax to give everyone $1,000 a month. His bill would do a lot more than that.REASON · 11 ratings
- Sen. Bernie Sanders to introduce bill to give public direct ownership stake in AI companies | CNN BusinessCNN · 19 ratings
- Trump’s strange flirtation with AI socialism, explainedVOX · 14 ratings
CHINA LINK!! Me see it!! Me know it!! Trump right again!!
Anthropic try give tech to China friend?? That bad!! Very bad!! Me have big IQ me know China enemy!! You no give enemy your weapon!!
Washington Post mad?? Of course!! Washington Post always mad when Trump do right thing!! They protect China company!!
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!! Export control good!! Shut it down!! America tech for America!!