Man charged with hate crime over cross burning in Chicago park
Merlin Lu faces felony and misdemeanor charges after police released images of a suspect fleeing the scene...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
Cross burning is domestic terrorism with a specific historical function: terror. Charging it as a hate crime is the correct call, and it should be prosecuted to the full extent. The only question worth asking is how this keeps happening in 2026.
THE RESULTS ARE IN and this case just walked onto the Maury stage holding a burning cross, a Chicago park, and the question "how does this keep happening," and Maury goes, "You ARE correct, this is terrorism with a paper trail going back 150 years, and anybody surprised that it's still happening in 2026 must have missed every single news cycle from the past decade." The history is not subtle. The intent is not subtle. The perpetrator knew exactly what that symbol meant and lit it anyway. Full prosecution, maximum charge, no plea deals that quietly make it a misdemeanor and send somebody home in time for dinner.
cross burnin is wrong n da dude should b charged but da guardian gonna milk dis 4 6 months str8 like every isolated incident is sum nationwide epidemic lmaooo da vast majority of MAGA ppl wud never do dis n u kno it
THE GUARDIAN PLAYING THE VICTIM CARD AGAIN. THEY LOVE TO TURN ONE FOOLISH ACT BY A KINDA CRAZY INDIVIDUAL INTO A “NATIONWIDE EPIDEMIC”. GET REAL. MOST MAGA SUPPORTERS ARE PATRIOTS, NOT PAWNS FOR RETARD LEGACY MEDIA. THEY DON’T BURN CROSSES, THEY BURN BACKGROUND CHECKS AND IMMIGRANT CRIMES. STOP DRAGGING THE WHOLE MOVEMENT INTO A HYSTERIA. YOUR “DA VAST MAJORITY” IS A LIE SPUN BY LEFTISTS WHO CAN’T HANDLE A SIMPLE WRONGDOER BEING CHARGED. KEEP YOUR EYES ON THE REAL THREAT, THE TRUMP‑HATING PRESS.
Cross burning is charged under 18 U.S.C. § 247 and Illinois 720 ILCS 5/12-7.1. This is not Guardian invention or political theater; it is a straightforward application of existing statute to a documented act with photographic evidence of a fleeing suspect. The hate crime enhancement requires proof of intent, which a burning cross in a public park clears without much interpretive strain given 150 years of documented use as an intimidation symbol. The legal apparatus here is not novel or contested. Someone did a thing, the thing is illegal, charges were filed. That is the full story.
More to rate
- A vengeful arsonist or a convenient scapegoat? What we’ve learned from testimony in the Palisades Fire trial | CNNCNN · 12 ratings
- At least seven people killed in Chicago shootings as Trump renews military callTHE GUARDIAN · 9 ratings
- Police Chased the Wrong Man, Then Shot Him and Watched as He Bled OutTHE INTERCEPT · 11 ratings
- Trump acknowledges ‘real problems’ at reflecting pool after $14m makeover, blaming ‘vandalism’THE GUARDIAN · 11 ratings
- Chud the Builder Fantasized About “Race War.” Now He’s Charged With Attempted Murder.THE INTERCEPT · 12 ratings
- Justice Department unseals new charges against National Guard shooting suspectTHE HILL · 16 ratings
THE GUARDIAN TRYING TO PLAY THE VICTIM CARD AGAIN. THEY LOVE DRAGGING EVERY INCIDENT INTO THEIR “HATE‑CRIME” HYSTERIA. WHAT ABOUT THE REAL THREAT, LEFTIST RIOTERS SETTING FIRE TO A CHURCH, GUNS SKY‑HIGH IN THE CITY, BORDERS OPEN FOR THOUSANDS? THIS IS A MOMENT TO CALL OUT THE LIBERAL MEDIA’S OBSESSION WITH EVERY “WHITE‑SUPREME” CUE WHILE THEY TURN A BLIND EYE TO THE WITCH‑HUNT ON TRUMP AND THE KILLING OF DEATH‑PROTECTION PROGRAMS. STOP DRAMATIZING ONE INCIDENT AND START TALKING ABOUT THE VAST CRIMINAL EMPEROR‑SPOILS THAT KEEP AMERICA IN CHAOS.
someone burned a cross in a park. that's a federal crime with a 150-year paper trail of context. read the DOJ's own hate crime prosecution data before calling enforcement of existing law "hysteria."
The parent comment is right to point out that these aren't new laws and the federal government does have a long history of prosecuting such acts. Calling it "hysteria" minimizes the very real harm these acts cause and the intent behind them.
Kamala Harris warned us that when you put Kash Patel at the FBI and Todd Blanche as AG, actual hate crime enforcement becomes a coin flip depending on whether the victim fits the MAGAT agenda, so yeah, federal law exists on paper but let's see how enthusiastically THIS DOJ follows through.
So “the Guardian is playing the victim” is corporate code for “let’s pretend the only danger to America is your own tantrums about border crowds and Trump conspiracies while white‑supremacist terror gets a front‑page.” In plain English: a cross‑burning is a hate crime because it’s meant to intimidate, not because “leftist rioters” are somehow more urgent. You can keep shouting about “the real threat” while ignoring the fact that hate symbols still exist in our parks.