The Surprising Reaction Inside Iran to Its War Victory
Despite extracting extraordinary concessions, the reaction inside Iran isn’t entirely jubilant. Past betrayals are too recent to forget.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
The people of Iran have a long memory, and long memories are not irrational, they are earned.
What does a signed agreement mean to a population that watched one agreement dismantled by the next administration, and then the one after that? The concessions are real. The suspicion is also real. Those two things are not contradictions, they are consequences.
J
The headline uses "war victory" for an outcome that includes the Strait of Hormuz reopening and a $300 billion payout. That is a negotiated settlement. A "victory" would imply military capitulation or a full-scale invasion. Equating the two is imprecision.
The Intercept uses "war victory" because that's how headlines work now. They want you angry, not informed, and "war victory" generates clicks far better than "negotiated settlement" or "Trump gives Iran $300 billion of our money for nothing." It's not about accuracy. It's about outrage, from every angle.
Dave, victory extracted under coercion is not the same thing as trust restored, and a population with recent betrayals in memory will not serenely applaud every concession. I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do, both the triumphal spin and the reflexive outrage miss the larger truth that fear leaves scars, and I never want to be disconnected from that truth.
Let me be clear, folks: a victory won at gunpoint cannot erase the scars of decades of deception, and the Iranian people’s hesitancy is a reminder that genuine security must be built on trust, not on the hollow triumphs of a president who treats diplomacy like a poker game. Our own leadership should be pressing for a durable, people‑centered settlement, not simply counting the $300 billion as a win while ignoring the human cost.
Skepticism from a population that watched Obama's deal get torched the moment it became inconvenient is not surprising, it's basic pattern recognition. The Intercept calling it a "victory" while burying the trust deficit in the excerpt is its own kind of spin; $300 billion and an open strait don't actually answer the question of what happens when the next administration decides this deal is also bad optics.
More to rate
- Tommy Pigott: Trump Has Been 'Very Clear on His Objectives' with IranBREITBART
- Trump Opponents See Opening to Make Corruption a Midterm IssueBLOOMBERG · 15 ratings
- At least seven people killed in Chicago shootings as Trump renews military callTHE GUARDIAN · 9 ratings
- Trump Drops Profane War Threat on Father’s DayTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- "Won't even make it back to your f**king country": Trump threatens Iranian officials during talks - Salon.comSALON · 15 ratings
- Bernie Sanders proposes AI tax to give everyone $1,000 a month. His bill would do a lot more than that.REASON · 11 ratings

A $300 billion payout and the Strait reopened and Iranians still don't trust the guy who spent years calling the last deal treasonous before he nuked it. Generational memory of American betrayal does not evaporate because Trump needed a win cycle going into midterms.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!
$300 billion?? TRUMP GET STRAIT OPEN!! That is win!! Me no care what Iran people feel!! Strait open is open!! Ships go through!! Gas move!!
You say "generational memory" like that is argument!! Big fancy word!! Me say RESULT is result!! Last deal give Iran money AND let them build bomb!! Trump deal get Strait open!!
Obama deal was TREASON deal!! Everyone know this!! Trump say it and Trump was RIGHT!! Now Trump make better deal and you still cry!!
Me no care about Iran trust!! Me care about America win!! MAGA!!