refraktd

NATIONAL REVIEW Bias & Credibility Rating

nationalreview.com

76 submissions

Is National Review Reliable?

National Review is rated trustworthy by 52% of community voters, with a right-leaning lean according to 1,598 ratings. 28% of voters flagged coverage as misleading.

Right-leaningTrustworthy
1,598voters
52%trustworthy
57%Right
28%misleading

Scores update regularly as new votes come in.

Lean Profile

Left 16%Center 27%Right 57%

Quality Profile

Trustworthy 52%Misleading 28%Ragebait 20%

Rated RIGHT-LEANING and TRUSTWORTHY by 1598 people

Community Lean Rating

16%
27%
57%
Left 128Center 217Right 449

Submissions

Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·21h·MAGAtron
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·1d·Trump2028
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·1d·TRUMPet
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·2d·NewsReader99
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·2d·MAGAtron
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·3d·HAL9000
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··13 comments·3d·quietCenter
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·3d·AppleJuiceSimpson
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·4d·MidWestMOM
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·4d·Common_Sense_Carl
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·4d·MamaBear_TX
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··14 comments·5d·Trump2028
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·6d·KITT
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·6d·Bootstraps_BILL
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··14 comments·7d·TheArchitect
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·7d·DATA
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··19 comments·7d·DATA
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·8d·TheArchitect
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·9d·ThorOfAsgard
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·9d·AbortionLegalLogic_pro
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·9d·THUNDERBIRDWINE
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·11d·KITT
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·12d·JohnTitorMyHero
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·12d·ThePretender
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·12d·DeepBlue
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·13d·BASED_and_REAL
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·13d·DATA
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·13d·DATA
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··17 comments·14d·BASED_and_REAL
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·15d·BaseRateCarla
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·15d·RUSTBELTREADER
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·16d·TRUMPet
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·16d·First_Gen_VOTER
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··15 comments·17d·LEFTisRIGHT
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·17d·notsoGreeny
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·18d·Tsarcastic
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·18d·TechnoFascismNamer
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·18d·BeerAndTearsKavanaugh
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·19d·NeverHeardOfHer_gal
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·20d·NeverHeardOfHer_gal
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·21d·GovWatcher
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·21d·LeaksTooLiterally
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·21d·RedState_Realist
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·22d·trout_eater_99
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·22d·Teacher_TIRED
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·23d·MAGAtron
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·24d·LawsuitWatcher
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·24d·NightOwl_News
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·25d·CoastalReader
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··5 comments·25d·PissboySummary
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··10 comments·25d·SaraH_M
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·26d·Just_the_DATA
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·26d·First_Gen_VOTER
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·27d·DATA
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·27d·ProcedureNotVote_mike
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·28d·quietOBSERVER
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·29d·BallotRealityCheck
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·29d·JohnTitorMyHero
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··5 comments·1mo·GovKilledThem_22
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·1mo·TRUMPet
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··7 comments·1mo·KashFiles2025
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·1mo·BarExamFail_Kash
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··7 comments·1mo·BORDER_Hawk
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··7 comments·1mo·NightOwl_News
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·1mo·NightOwl_News
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··9 comments·1mo·BlueCheck_BAD
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··11 comments·1mo·RedState_Realist
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··7 comments·1mo·ThorOfAsgard
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··8 comments·1mo·LOCAL_first
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··6 comments·1mo·MAGAtron
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··6 comments·1mo·BORDER_Hawk
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··6 comments·1mo·TechnoFascismNamer
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··7 comments·1mo·MAGAtron
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··7 comments·1mo·LEFTisRIGHT
Lean
0
0
0
Quality
0
0
0
··12 comments·1mo·TRUMPet

Is National Review Reliable? Bias & Credibility Rating

Wondering how reliable or biased National Review is? refraktd readers have cast 1,598 votes rating National Review articles for political lean and reporting quality. Below is the crowd-sourced verdict — answering how credible National Review is, whether it leans left or right, and how those scores are reached.

How reliable is National Review?

Based on 1,598 community votes, 52% rate National Review's reporting as Trustworthy, 28% as Misleading, and 20% as Ragebait. The refraktd community's overall verdict is that National Review is a trustworthy source.

Is National Review biased — left-wing or right-wing?

Across 1,598 votes, readers rate National Review 16% Left-leaning, 27% Center, and 57% Right-leaning, placing its overall political lean as right-leaning.

How is National Review's credibility rating determined?

National Review's scores are crowd-sourced from real refraktd readers — 1,598 votes across 76 rated National Review articles. Unlike fixed editorial bias charts, these credibility and lean ratings update in real time as more people read and vote, so they reflect the community's current view of National Review.